Insider Trading by Sector
Open-market SEC Form 4 buying vs selling across the eleven GICS sectors, last 90 days.
All sectors
11- Information Technology
$65.23M
Bought
$5.61B
Sold
221 buys · 4,151 sells
551 / 1,111 active
Insider buying - Health Care
$307.01M
Bought
$2.69B
Sold
308 buys · 1,898 sells
509 / 1,239 active
Insider buying - Financials
$434.42M
Bought
$1.21B
Sold
394 buys · 1,043 sells
437 / 1,155 active
Insider buying - Consumer Discretionary
$262.67M
Bought
$834.22M
Sold
251 buys · 530 sells
276 / 576 active
Insider buying - Industrials
$284.61M
Bought
$1.78B
Sold
212 buys · 653 sells
296 / 665 active
Insider buying - Materials
$95.23M
Bought
$416.89M
Sold
117 buys · 333 sells
169 / 411 active
Insider buying - Real Estate
$28.64M
Bought
$3.84B
Sold
114 buys · 108 sells
105 / 280 active
Insider buying - Consumer Staples
$34.23M
Bought
$235.13M
Sold
65 buys · 253 sells
86 / 259 active
Insider buying - Utilities
$1.21B
Bought
$125.10M
Sold
185 buys · 155 sells
65 / 154 active
Insider buying - Communication Services
$39.53M
Bought
$229.32M
Sold
36 buys · 228 sells
62 / 144 active
Insider buying - Energy
$14.33M
Bought
$2.09B
Sold
38 buys · 114 sells
67 / 153 active
Insider buying
How to read this
Selling normally dwarfs buying because executives are paid in stock and sell to diversify or cover taxes; elevated open-market BUYING is the unusual, informative case. "Active" counts companies with at least one Form 4 in the 90-day window. Sectors follow the eleven GICS classifications, with SIC-only filers mapped across a standard crosswalk.
Reading insider flow at the sector level
The eleven sectors here are the Global Industry Classification Standard, built by MSCI and S&P Dow Jones Indices and used by most institutional investors to organise the equity market. A company is placed by its principal business activity, judged mainly by where its revenue comes from, so the boundaries occasionally surprise: a payments network sits in Financials rather than Information Technology, and a large online retailer sits in Consumer Discretionary rather than in technology at all. Where we hold no GICS assignment for a filer, we map its SEC-assigned SIC code across a standard crosswalk, which is close but not identical, so treat a single company's placement as approximate and the aggregate as sound.
The first thing to internalise is that these columns are not symmetric. Selling exceeds buying in almost every sector in almost every quarter, and that is a fact about how executives are paid rather than a verdict on the market. Equity compensation arrives as grants and vesting options, so an executive who never forms an opinion about their own shares will still generate a stream of sales to cover withholding tax and to avoid holding most of their net worth in one stock. Nobody is ever handed shares by accident on the buy side. This is why the buy share of dollar flow is the column worth watching: it is the part of the picture that requires a decision.
Compare sectors against their own history rather than against each other. A sector of large, mature companies whose executives hold enormous vested positions will always show a low buy share, and a sector full of small companies where founders still own their stock will always show a high one. The signal is a shift: Energy running at three times its normal buy share, or Financials going quiet after a year of steady purchases, says more than a cross-sector league table ever will.
Seasonality is the other trap. Insiders are barred from trading during the blackout period their company sets around results, typically from a few weeks before quarter end until a day or two after the release. Since companies in the same sector tend to report in the same weeks, an entire sector can fall silent for reasons that have nothing to do with what its insiders think. A sector showing almost no activity is usually in blackout, not in despair, and the 90-day window here is deliberately long enough to span at least one full reporting cycle for most of them.
Use this page as a way in rather than as an answer. Open a sector to see which companies are behind its numbers, because a sector total is frequently one very large purchase in one company rather than a broad mood, and a single 10% owner building a position can move an entire sector's bar on its own. The company-level view is where the distinction between a trend and one large cheque becomes visible.